by bedouin » December 7th, 2009, 1:11 am
Think of tracks like tracks on a 4 track cassette recorder.
You could assign drums to one track, or perhaps each drum individually to its own track (kick = track 1, snare = track 2). You can have 48 tracks with totally different note data that can be muted and unmuted. So usually how this is going to play out for me is:
1) Track 1 = Chop a sample up, program it here.
2) Track 2 = Drop drums up, program them here
3) Tracks 3-4 = Perhaps spreads kicks, snares, and hi-hats across different tracks for more control
4) Track 5 = Sample used only in a hook
5) Track 6 = A low pass filter of the same sample to beef up bass
6) Track 7 = Perhaps a horn sample
7) Etc as needed . . .
Sequences contain note data and every sequence can contain different track arrangements.
So sequence one is a 4 measure beat on track one and a loop on track two (both are unmuted).
Sequence two is a 2 measure drum roll on track one with no loop on track two.
Sequence three is identical to sequence one but contains a pitch shifted rhodes sample you play on track three
Each sequence will remember which tracks were muted and unmuted.
When you finish the basics of a beat you want to turn it into a song, so you start chaining sequences together in song mode.
So if you want the beat to start out with a drum roll, 16 bars for a verse, and 8 for a hook you would then chain your sequences together like:
Seq 1 > Seq 2 > Seq 2 > Seq 2 > Seq 2 > Seq 3 > Seq 3 > End
Convert to song to sequence if you want later and add some more stuff on top if you want for a live feeling.
The big thing is that each track can be assigned its own program group. So if you've got a program of 48 drums chopped, and a sample chopped 48 times, and then a synth you're sequencing from the MPC each of those would have their own individual programs, assigned to individual tracks.
Which adds in another component: tracks and sequences do not necessarily have to contain sample data, but they can control external devices through MIDI.
Writing this makes me wonder why I'm trying to learn the RS7000 when I'm clearly an MPC guy -- but that's another story.